Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 28, 1994No. 93-2099Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWellford, Circuit Judge

I concur with the majority view that plaintiff LeRoy does not establish any “substantive due process” violation. I also concur that the penalties imposed upon LeRoy by defendant Board for threats and profanity have not been shown to violate constitutional equal protection requirements.

Respectfully, I cannot agree and, therefore, dissent to the qualified immunity issue with regard to the search at issue.

On April 27, 1987, Steven Leroy, plaintiff, drove a pick-up truck on the grounds of the Maywood Park Racetrack. Plaintiffs truck was searched pursuant to Illinois Racing Board (“IRB”) Rule…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Mary Beth G. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Dimeo v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Don Serpas, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles E. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API