Harmon v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
After the foreclosure of mortgage debt on a real-estate investment property triggered taxable gains to the investors, respondent Commissioner of Revenue requested that appellant Germaine Harmon file a 2010 Minnesota income-tax return. Three years later, Harmon still had not filed a return. Accordingly, the Commissioner assessed Harmon’s 2010 Minnesota income-tax liability based on a Schedule K-1 filed by the partnership in charge of the foreclosed real-estate investment. Harmon appealed to the tax court, challenging the Commissioner’s assessment. On cross motions for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Renee Vasko, Relator v. County of McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024