Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 2017No. A16-0973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

After the foreclosure of mortgage debt on a real-estate investment property triggered taxable gains to the investors, respondent Commissioner of Revenue requested that appellant Germaine Harmon file a 2010 Minnesota income-tax return. Three years later, Harmon still had not filed a return. Accordingly, the Commissioner assessed Harmon’s 2010 Minnesota income-tax liability based on a Schedule K-1 filed by the partnership in charge of the foreclosed real-estate investment. Harmon appealed to the tax court, challenging the Commissioner’s assessment. On cross motions for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Renee Vasko, Relator v. County of McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API