Legal Opinion

Brust v. Brust

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is a suit for divorce brought by Helene Brust against Emil Brust. The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant were married in Berlin, Germany, on the 20th day of May, 1922; that one child, now of legal age, was born to them as the issue of said marriage; and that “the defendant has treated the plaintiff in a cruel and inhuman manner and by personal indignities has rendered the life of the plaintiff with the defendant burdensome and unbearable.” Some of these acts are alleged to be as follows: That during the past few years defendant has lost all love and affection for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bamford v. BamfordOregon Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Gooden v. GoodenOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Wetmore v. WetmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Michels v. MichelsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  5. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BoydIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re the Marriage of HolemarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API