Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Holemar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 1976No. 75-3276, CA 6235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The respondent prayed for dissolution of marriage. The appellant cross-petitioned for annulment alleging voidness of the marriage due to fraud. The trial court granted the dissolution. The appellant asks that we void the marriage and set aside the provisions of the decree for child and spousal support and for attorney fees. The testimony was extensive, but a summary will be sufficient on appeal.

The appellant, 62, a native of Czechoslovakia, advertised there for a bride and the respondent, a 31-year-old Czechoslovakian ophthalmologist, replied. A long-distance courtship followed. They visited…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of ColbathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Brust v. BrustOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hayter v. HayterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ravenscroft v. RavenscroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In re the Marriage of HolemarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. In re the Marriage of EndersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API