In Re the Marriage of Holemar
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
The respondent prayed for dissolution of marriage. The appellant cross-petitioned for annulment alleging voidness of the marriage due to fraud. The trial court granted the dissolution. The appellant asks that we void the marriage and set aside the provisions of the decree for child and spousal support and for attorney fees. The testimony was extensive, but a summary will be sufficient on appeal.
The appellant, 62, a native of Czechoslovakia, advertised there for a bride and the respondent, a 31-year-old Czechoslovakian ophthalmologist, replied. A long-distance courtship followed. They visited…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of ColbathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Brust v. BrustOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Hayter v. HayterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ravenscroft v. RavenscroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re the Marriage of HolemarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- In re the Marriage of EndersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998