Legal Opinion

Jung-Nam Yang and Seung-Han Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 23, 1978No. 77-1615PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.

Jung-Nam Yang and her husband, Seung-Han Yang, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (herein “the Board”) dismissing their appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge finding them deportable under the Immigration and Nationality Act § 241(a)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (Supp.1977). 1 Petitioners, both natives and citizens of Korea, entered the United States as non-immigrant visitors for pleasure in February and March 1974, with authorizations to remain until no later than May 1974. About a year later, on April 29,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service v. HibiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Arturo Ascencio Mendez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Sun Il Yoo v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Robert Asmar and Kathleen AsmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. United States v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  5. Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API