Legal Opinion
Healy v. Ratta
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 20, 1933No. 669PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 15.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Smith v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by15 opinions
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McCart v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.