Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. McCool

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1916No. 11346PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Stevens county, Sullivan, J., entered February 5, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to enjoin a foreclosure sale and to quiet title, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action instituted by Elizabeth O’Donnell against Hugh McCool, Mary McCool, his wife, and The First National Bank of Walla Walla, to restrain the sale under a decree of foreclosure of certain real property situated in Stevens county, and to quiet the plaintiff’s claim of title to the property. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal to this court.

The facts, as we gather them from the record, are in substance these: The lands in question lie within the belt and form a part of the lieu land grant made by the government of the United States to the Northern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HemenwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Bernot v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hutchinson v. Mt. Vernon Water & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Croup v. DeMossWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Shepherd v. DouganIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ihrke v. Continental Life Insurance & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Starwich v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API