Steiny & Co. v. California Electric Supply Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEAL, J.—
Summary
Where a plaintiff’s proper invocation of the trade secrets privilege prevents a defendant from examining the basis for the plaintiff’s damage claim, the trial court may properly bar the plaintiff’s damage evidence at trial. If a buyer and a seller exchange invoice and purchase order with conflicting warranty terms, but their conduct shows that a contract has been formed, California Uniform Commercial Code section 2207 applies to form a contract around the parts of the invoice and purchase order which agree, supplemented by the other applicable provisions of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- North Oakland Medical Clinic v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- 2,022 Ranch L.L.C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.