Legal Opinion
Rubinbaum LLP v. Related Corporate Partners V
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 2001No. 00 CIV 2715 JGKPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, RubinBaum LLP (“Ru-binBaum”), brings this statutory inter-pleader action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335. RubinBaum has met the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1335(a)(2) by depositing $906,963.56 (the “Funds”) it held as an escrow agent with the registry of the Court. 1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 1335(a)(1), the Funds are allegedly subject to adverse claims by Related Corporate Partners V, L.P. (“Related V”) and Related Corporate SLP, L.P. (“Related SLP”) (collectively the “Related Defendants”); the Brannon Group, L.C. (the “Company”); and D.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Madison Stock Transfer, Inc. v. Exlites Holdings Int'l, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Alpha Capital Anstalt v. Oxysure Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Schneider v. CateDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2005
- Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., National Ass'n v. Telos CLO 1006-1 Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Williams v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.