Legal Opinion
Commissioner of Public Welfare v. Kotel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.
We have examined the record in this proceeding and have reached the conclusion that the evidence introduced on behalf of the respondent is not entirely satisfactory within the meaning of the authorities when viewed in the light of the testimony given by the appellant and his witnesses. We are of the opinion, therefore, that the appellant should not have been adjudged to be the father of the child.
Two dates seem to have been uppermost in the mind of the complaining witness. One was on October 2, 1937, when the child was born and the other was on January 5, 1937, the date she claimed the act of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner of Public Welfare v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Drummond v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Burke v. BurpoNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- People ex rel. Mendelovich v. AbrahamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- People v. McKayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jane L. v. Rodney B.New York City Family Court · 1981
- Rebmann v. MuldoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Bayne v. WillardNew York City Family Court · 1965
- Brown v. LabusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Commissioner of Welfare v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.