Opinion No. 71-227 (1971) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLIC UTILITY — FRANCHISE TAX PAYMENT TO CITY — LAWS REGARDING There are both constitutional and statutory provisions bearing upon the question of whether a public utility power company may rightfully withdraw its voluntary one percent (1%) franchise tax payment and discount granted by it to cities on the cost of electrical service to the city itself. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion contained in your letter dated March 17, 1971, in regard to the following question: "Are there either constitutional or statutory provisions which would bear on whether a public…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. City of West Plains v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Tulsa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- City of Elmhurst v. Western United Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.