Legal Opinion
Ronald Oyenik v. Corizon Health Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2017No. 15-16850UnpublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Ronald Edward Oyenik (“Oyenik”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Corizon Health, Inc. (“Cori-zon”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand. Because the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, we do not repeat them here.
The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the infliction of “cruel and unusual punishments.” By enacting 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Congress ensured that “[ejvery person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Rabieh v. Paragon Sys. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Arceo v. City of RosevilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Benge v. Corizon Health LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Buelna v. DannelsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.