Legal Opinion

Arceo v. City of Roseville

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 22, 2023No. 2:20-cv-02334Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-02334-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 14 CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AS MOOT 15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 59, 86) 16 17 This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss and to strike filed on behalf of 18 defendants Sheriff Devon Bell, Captain David Powers, and the County of Placer (collectively, 19 “moving defendants”). (Doc. No. 59.)…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API