Legal Opinion
Buelna v. Dannels
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 27, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00216Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lorenia Buelna, et al., No. CV-21-00216-TUC-SHR 10 Plaintiffs, Order Re: Motion to Dismiss 11 v. 12 Mark Dannels, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendants Cochise County Board of Supervisors and Santa Cruz County Board of 16 Supervisors (“Defendants”) have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against them 17 (Doc. 1) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).1 (Doc. 5.) For the following 18 reasons, the Court grants the Motion to Dismiss in part and denies it in part. 19 I. Background 20 The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.