Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Russell
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 16, 2019No. Case Number 17-13062PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court are motions by the defendants challenging the use at trial of testimony by four of the plaintiff's expert witnesses, in which the defendants variously argue that the experts are unqualified, or their opinions are unreliable or irrelevant (or all three). The substance and admissibility of each expert's opinion is discussed in turn below.
I
As discussed in the several opinions issued in this case, plaintiff Davontae Sanford filed this case in 2017, alleging that he was wrongfully convicted of a quadruple homicide allegedly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Antero Resources Corporation v. Tejas Tubular Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Grover v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Mark Craighead v. Barbara Simon, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Nelson v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.