Legal Opinion

Baker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1887No. 12136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County refusing to change the place of trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

— The action in this cause was brought in the Superior Court of the county of San Joaquin to procure a decree declaring a deed absolute on its face to hy a mortagage, and for a reconveyance of the real estate described in said deed, which real estate is situate in said county of San Joaquin.

Defendant, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Cali*183forma, and having its principal place of business at San Francisco, demanded a change of the place of trial to the city and county of San Francisco, which demand was not acceded to; whereupon defendant moved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hall v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Owen v. Crocker-Huffman Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API