Legal Opinion

Viking Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1993No. C013826PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, Acting P. J.

In this insurance coverage dispute, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a judgment in favor of Viking Insurance Company (Viking). The issue on appeal is whether under California law an underinsurance carrier, faced with claims from several insureds arising from one accident, can offset from the amount it owes to one of these insureds the amount that has been paid to the other insureds under the underinsured motorist’s per accident liability policy. We interpret the relevant statutes and conclude they contemplate such an offset. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Schnyder v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Daun v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Redding Medical Center v. Bonta'California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. California Capital Insurance v. NielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API