Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1999No. 07-98-0306-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.

Appellant Billy London Hughes pled guilty to the offense of robbery pursuant to a plea bargain recommendation by the State. Appellant asserts the trial court erred by overruling his pretrial motion to suppress post-hypnotic testimony. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant and two other persons were indicted for aggravated robbery. By a pretrial motion appellant moved for suppression of post-hypnotic testimony of Charles Hearron, who was the store clerk at the time of the robbery. Appellant alleged that Hearron was at first unable to identify appellant as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Kraft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Medrano, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
  2. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. State v. Medrano, Matthew, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
  5. Woodall, DavidCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API