Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Van Wright

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 1529PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to read his requested instruction on the issue of alibi. 1 We agree and, therefore, vacate the judgment of sentence and grant appellant a new trial.

On March 12, 1975, Philadelphia police arrested and charged appellant and another man with robbery 2 and criminal conspiracy. 3 Appellant and his co-defendant were tried before a jury from January 13, 1976, through January 20, 1976. At trial, the complaining witness testified to the following version of events. On March 12, 1975, he went to a drug rehabilitation center at 3rd…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. United States v. Edward George BoozCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API