Legal Opinion

United States v. John Carneglia

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 30, 1972No. 23, 74 and 75, Dockets 72-1248, 72-1462 and 72-1611PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, J., appellants John Carneglia, Salvatore DeVito and Louis Inzerillo were convicted of possessing goods stolen while in interstate commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Carneglia and DeVito were sentenced to five years imprisonment, Inzerillo to four. 1 Appellants individually and together assert numerous grounds for reversal, but as we find none of their arguments persuasive, we affirm the judgments of conviction.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Deberry and Julius EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Lionel MohabirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. United States v. William Trotter, in No. 75--1709, and Vincent Nuzzo. Appeal of Vincent Nuzzo, in No. 75--1710Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Michael Reeves FloydCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API