Woodall v. Greater

This action was brought by Greater, as assignee of a promissory note, executed by Woodall to one Glore, and by him assigned to Greater. Answer:

1. A general denial.

2. That the note was executed by the defendant to Glore for part of the consideration which the defendant was to pay to said Glore for the right to use and vend said Glore’s Patent Feather Renovater in the State of Indiana, for which Glore represented that he had obtained letters patent from the United States as a new and useful invention, and that the same would renovate old feathers and make them as good as new feathers; that the…