Legal Opinion

State v. Murray.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1905PublishedCited by 14 opinions

INDICTMENT for murder against W. R. Murray, beard by Judge R. B. Peebles and a jury, at tbe January Criminal Term, 1905, of tbe Superior Court of Dueham County. Erom a verdict and sentence for manslaughter, tbe prisoner appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an indictment for murder and an appeal from a conviction and sentence for manslaughter. It was material for the State to show that tbe prisoner fired tbe fatal shot, and several witnesses were introduced who swore positively that when the fourth shot was fired the weapon was in the hands of the prisoner, while other witnesses testified that they did not see the pistol and did not know in whose hands it was when the last or fourth shot was fired. Upon this point ILis Honor instructed the jury as follows: “The law says that it is yoür duty to give to positive testimony greater weight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stitt v. HuidekopersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. State v. . GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. State v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Henderson v. . CrouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
  5. State v. . HoranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Reidsville Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Rosser v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. McMillan v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API