Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McMillan v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.

Plaintiff alleged that in his intestate, J. W. Stout, was killed by a collision between an automobile, driven by another, in which he was riding, and a train of defendant at a crossing in East Kings Mountain on 17 August, 1914, and that his death was caused by defendant's negligence. The jury returned the following verdict:

1. Was the plaintiff's intestate killed by the negligence of the servants and agents of the Southern Railway Company, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "No."

2. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? No answer. Judgment thereon, and defendant appealed.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Dougan v. . Champlain Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Corcoran v. . Village of PeekskillNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Danville Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gallivan Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Pusey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API