Legal Opinion

Heitkoetter v. Domm

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 7, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00368Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, an individual, CASE NO. 22-cv-368-AWI-BAM and ROCKWELL TRADING SERVICES, 9 LLC, a Texas limited liability company, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 10 Plaintiff, MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 KARL DOMM, an individual, 12 (Doc. No. 9) Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (“Rockwell”) bring 18 several claims sounding in defamation against Defendant Karl Domm based on allegations that he 19 published injurious…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API