Legal Opinion

Quicksilver v. Haynes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1932No. 6147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

In this case the facts are admitted and may be briefly stated. Samuel and William Quicksilver, brothers, were partners in a mercantile business. In 1927, a third brother, Nate Quicksilver, was admitted to a one-third interest in the partnership, for which he paid $5,000. This money he borrowed from a fourth brother, Edward Quicksilver. For convenience, these parties will be hereafter referred to merely by their given names. The partnership was operating two stores, one at Odessa and one at Wichita Falls, Tex. In May, 1929, the partnership was dissolved, and by agreement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins-Decker Co. v. CrumplerTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Axtell Co. v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Yancey v. Lamar-Rankin Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Freedman & Mellinger v. MaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashton v. LeysenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. In re RudyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939
  3. Ashton v. LeysenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API