Legal Opinion
El Dorado Union High School District v. City of Placerville
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1983No. Civ. No. 21989PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal by the City of Placerville (City) and Mace Lumsden and Lumsden, Inc. (Lumsden) from a judgment granting the El Dorado Union High School District’s (District) petition for writ of mandate and an injunction. The trial court set aside City’s approval of a tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential development and an environmental impact report (EIR) for that project, and prohibited City from allowing the project to proceed until an EIR is prepared analyzing the impact of the development on schools operated by District.
The dispositive issue on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- City of Santee v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.