Legal Opinion

Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1993No. C3-93-1014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

The Star Tribune (newspaper) sought a writ of mandamus to require the Board of Education, Special School District No. 1 (school board) to conduct in public all future meetings and hearings regarding a superintendent and two district employees. The trial court interpreted Minn.Stat. § 471.705, subd. ld(c) and (e) (1992) to compel open meetings until litigation was commenced by those employees against the school board. On appeal from the issuance of the writ, the school board argues the judgment is overly restrictive and contrary to precedent. We reverse.

FACTS

Questions of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Bus Employees v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Claxton Enterprise v. Evans County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. State v. GianakosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Christopher v. Windom Area School BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Demming v. Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  5. DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been assessed vacant building registration fees in 2013 v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API