Legal Opinion

Vignot v. Bank of Mystic

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 3, 1993No. 11823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The defendants Richard A. Kushman, Kathleen Kushman, Eugene C. Cushman, and Sylvia A. Cushman (Kushmans) appeal from a deficiency judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Henry Vig-not and Marjorie Vignot.1 The dispositive issues on appeal are (1) whether the defendant mortgagors, after a judgment of strict foreclosure had been entered and title vested in the mortgagees, could raise a defense during the deficiency proceeding that could have been raised during the foreclosure proceeding, and (2) whether the plaintiff mortgagees can obtain a deficiency judgment against any of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Bank v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. People's Bank v. Bilmor Building Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Bank of Stamford v. AlaimoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. VollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Danzig v. PDPA, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. CTB Ventures 55, Inc. v. RubensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API