Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dekker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1941No. Civ. 13105PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From 1) a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover damages and for an injunction predicated upon a cause of action alleging unfair competition, and 2) a judgment in favor of defendant Dekker on a cross-complaint to recover the amounts due upon a promissory note and for breach of a contract with plaintiffs Hall, after trial before the court without a jury, defendants appeal.

The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:

May 25, 1930, plaintiffs Hall commenced a floral business in the city of Los Angeles. Their principal activity was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Martin v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. GaffneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Raines v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Frank H. Gibson, Inc. v. OMAHA COFFEE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Colaco v. Cavotec SA, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API