Hall v. Dekker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From 1) a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover damages and for an injunction predicated upon a cause of action alleging unfair competition, and 2) a judgment in favor of defendant Dekker on a cross-complaint to recover the amounts due upon a promissory note and for breach of a contract with plaintiffs Hall, after trial before the court without a jury, defendants appeal.
The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:
May 25, 1930, plaintiffs Hall commenced a floral business in the city of Los Angeles. Their principal activity was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Martin v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. GaffneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Raines v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Frank H. Gibson, Inc. v. OMAHA COFFEE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Colaco v. Cavotec SA, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.