Legal Opinion

Cool v. Cool

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From tbe DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Elizabeth Cool, the appellee, brought suit against the appellants, devisees under the will of Christopher Cool, deceased, for partition of the real estate described in the complaint. She» alleged in her complaint that on the fifteenth day of February, 1874, Christopher Cool, being then the owner of said real estate, devised the same, by his last will, (a copy of which is made an exhibit,) to the plaintiff, Elizabeth, now his widow, during her natural life, and at her death to the children of his brothers, John and Thomas Cool, and of his sister, Catherine Thrall, share and share alike.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rusing v. RusingIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Armstrong v. BerremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Morris v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Brookville & Connersville Turnpike Co. v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Hauk v. McComasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. McCullough v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API