Legal Opinion
People v. Minahen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1986No. F004225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, Acting P. J.
Statement of the Case
Appellant Michael Minahen appeals from an order extending his commitment under Penal Code section 1026.5. 1 He contends that he was entitled to a greater custodial credit than allowed by the Board of Prison Terms (BPT) in fixing his maximum term of commitment and that under the correct term, the petition to extend his commitment was filed after his projected release date thereby depriving the trial court of jurisdiction to extend his commitment.
While we agree that appellant’s maximum term of commitment was incorrectly computed by the BPT and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re MoyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. PaciniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HubbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Garcetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. KirklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.