Herman Chanen Construction Co. v. Guy Apple Masonry Contractors Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
The appellant, plaintiff in the lower court, seeks review of an order dismissing with prejudice its complaint against the appellee, defendant in the lower court. (We shall hereinafter refer to appellant as Chanen and appellee as Apple.) The trial court found that Chanen’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief might be granted.
The gravamen of Chanen’s claim was that it was entitled to indemnification by Apple of losses sustained by Chanen in the amount of approximately $61,000. This claim was predicated entirely upon a contract between Chanen, as contractor, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGonigle v. GryphanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Southern Coast Corporation v. Sinclair Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Fluor Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Perez Ex Rel. Perez v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dimitri Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Vinson v. Marton & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Coeur D'Alene Lakeshore Owners & Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.