Legal Opinion
State v. Rubio
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 2001No. 21,875PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant, Ruben Rubio, appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant and his motion to suppress incriminating statements made to police while they were executing the search warrant. Additionally, Defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence the cocaine found during the execution of the search warrant. We affirm.
Facts
{2} On January 11, 2000, Detective Daniel Carter of the Lea County Drug Task Force…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. VerdugoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. VerdugoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.