Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 12, 1906No. 16,003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A. C. Bowen was charged with being a vagrant. From an order dismissing the prosecution, the city of Shreveport excepted, and applies for certiorari and mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.

An affidavit was made before tbe city court of Shreveport charging that the defendant is a “vagrant, being a person without visible means of support, who gambles, at the game of draw poker, for a living, in the city of Shreveport,” etc.; but the judge refused to arraign the accused or to receive any plea from him, and dismissed the prosecution, whereupon the city excepted and applied to this court for a writ of certiorari, and for a mandamus to compel the judge to proceed with the trial; and, the usual rule nisi having issued, the judge, for cause why the mandamus should not be made…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. City of Lake Charles v. MarcantelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. State v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. City of New Orleans v. PostekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. City of New Orleans v. PostekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API