San Diego Flume Co. v. Souther
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
On Rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
A rehearing of this case was allowed upon the petition of persons interested in one of the questions involved appearing as amici carite, who earnestly contended that the long line of decisions of the supreme court of California, sustaining the validity of contracts for water rights entered into between wa*707ter companies and consumers of water, did not necessarily include an adjudication that such contracts were not rendered invalid by certain provisions of the constitution of California, since it nowhere, in express terms, appeared in any of those decisions that those…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Osborne v. San Diego Land & Town Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coslett v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. Laramie Rivers Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stanislaus CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. JasperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1901
- Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland v. Bear Valley Irr. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.