Legal Opinion
Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland v. Bear Valley Irr. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Decided January 20, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought to foreclose the lien of a certain mortgage or trust deed alleged to have been executed by the defendant Bear Valley Irrigation Company to the complainant, and of certain receivers’ certificates alleged to have been issued pursuant to orders of this court made in the preceding- case of Foster v. Irrigation Co., 65 Fed. 836. The suit was commenced September 16, 1895, but as some of the important questions involved were pending in the appellate courts on appeals from decisions heretofore rendered by this court in other cases, and continued undetermined…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Blue River Co. v. Summit County Development Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Bear Valley Land & Water Co. v. Savings & Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1902
- Franklin Trust Co. v. Peninsular Pure Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
- Behrends v. SutherlandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1910