Legal Opinion

New York Plate Glass Ins. Co. v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1916No. 6736PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Washita County ; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the New York Plate Glass Insurance Company against C. H. Wright, doing business as the C. H. Wright Dry Goods Company, for damages. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HAYSON, C.

The New York Plate Glass Insurance Company brought suit against C. H. WVight, doing business as 'C. H. Wright Dry Goods Company, for damages, claiming that C. H. Wright as tenant of a certain store building negligently broke a plate glass window which the New York Plate Glass Insurance Company had insured, stating in the petition that after settling the loss with the owner, by replacing the glass at an expense of $60, the owner had assigned the claim to the company. C. H. Wright filed a general denial, and the cause was tried to a jury. At the close of- the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FoltzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Davis v. ReederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Lord v. Oklahoma State Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Schneider v. AtheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API