Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Archstone
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-1326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, summary judgment will be granted for defendant. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Arehstone Communities LLC (“Arch-stone”) “is an investor, developer and operator of apartment communities in the United States,” and its “portfolio includes numerous properties in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.” Def.’s Mem. of Law in Supp. of its Cross-Mot. for Summ. J. and Opp’n to Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J. [ECF No. 119] (“Def.’s Mem.”), Decl. of Chris…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Holloway v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Landmark Legal Foundation v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bruder v. MonizDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014