Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Cummins Engine Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 6, 1985No. 22401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant, Cummins Florida, Inc., (Cummins Florida) along with five other defendants, was sued by the respondent, Hollis M. Hammond (Hammond), who was seeking to recover under three causes of action; the gravamen of the complaint being the failure of a motor to live up to its warranties. Prior to the matter being submitted to the jury, all defendants except Cummins Florida were removed from the action. Cummins Florida filed a Notice of Special Appearance to contest jurisdiction of the South Carolina court and, likewise, filed a demurrer alleging misjoinder of the causes of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Triplett Ex Rel. Triplett v. R. M. Wade & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. CB ASKINS v. Firedoor Corp. of Fla.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Parker v. Williams & Madjanik, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Engineered Products v. Cleveland Crane & EngineeringSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Southern Plastics Co. v. Southern Commerce BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Moosally v. WW Norton & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Colite Industries, Inc. v. G. W. Murphy Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Hidria, USA, Inc. v. DeloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API