Legal Opinion

Baker v. Ohio Farmers' Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit on an insurance policy. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The undisputed facts in this case are these: The. plaintiff lives in the city of Saginaw, where she owned a lot having a dwelling-house and barn thereon. Upon these premises was a mortgage dated December 31, 1884, and given for $900. Upon May 24, 1886, there was about $608 due upon, it. Upon that day there was issued to her a policy of insurance in the defendant company, insuring the house for $1,200 and the barn for $300, against loss or damage by fire, for a period of 45 days. June 20, 1886, the house was totally destroyed by fire, and the barn injured to the extent of $35. The company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brown v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Chase v. . the Hamilton Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Michigan State Insurance v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crouse v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mazeika ex rel. Willis v. Automobile Underwriters of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  3. Supreme Lib. Life Ins. Co. v. CarverMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Washington National Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Mastergeorge v. Utica Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API