Mazeika ex rel. Willis v. Automobile Underwriters of America
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson
delivered the opinion of the court.
By this appeal the defendant, Automobile Underwriters of America,, seeks to reverse a judgment recovered against it in the municipal court of Chicago by the plaintiff in the sum of $800. Two judgments had been recovered against Mazeika, one by Curtis & Company and one by one Willis, and these judgment creditors brought garnishment proceedings against the defendant. The cases were consolidated and re-suited, as stated above, in a trial before the court without a jury.
It seems that the defendant is a mutual insurance organization…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Lycoming Fire Insurance v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Baker v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Rogers v. Cedar Rapids Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Columbian Exposition Salvage Co. v. Union Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buysse v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
- Charlton v. WakimotoIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- Illinois National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Capps v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925