Legal Opinion

Mazeika ex rel. Willis v. Automobile Underwriters of America

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1922No. Gen. No. 27,065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.

By this appeal the defendant, Automobile Underwriters of America,, seeks to reverse a judgment recovered against it in the municipal court of Chicago by the plaintiff in the sum of $800. Two judgments had been recovered against Mazeika, one by Curtis & Company and one by one Willis, and these judgment creditors brought garnishment proceedings against the defendant. The cases were consolidated and re-suited, as stated above, in a trial before the court without a jury.

It seems that the defendant is a mutual insurance organization…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lycoming Fire Insurance v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Baker v. Ohio Farmers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Rogers v. Cedar Rapids Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Columbian Exposition Salvage Co. v. Union Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buysse v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Charlton v. WakimotoIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  4. Illinois National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  5. Capps v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API