Keeling v. Neuss Floor Covering Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury could reasonably have found the following facts: He was struck and injured by a truck of the defendant while crossing State Street in Bridgeport at a point some distance from any street intersection or usual crosswalk. He passed between two parked cars and went a foot or two beyond them, looked to the right and left but saw no car approaching. He then proceeded to walk slowly straight across the street without looking again for approaching traffic. When he had proceeded some eighteen feet to a point a little beyond the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Woodhull v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Paskewicz v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Sinkus v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosen v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- White's Auto Stores v. BoazCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Com. v. Bush, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015