Legal Opinion

Dupont v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs applied to the defendant commission for a package store all-alcoholic permit for premises located in a business zone in Stratford. After hearing pursuant to statute, the commission refused to grant the application. The plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, where the town joined in the action as a party defendant because of the plaintiffs’ claim that certain provisions of its zoning ordinance are invalid. Upon a stipulation as to the facts the court sustained the appeal and rendered judgment directing the commission to issue the permit. The defendant town has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Gannett v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Nassau Wood Indus. v. Plng./zng. Comm., No. Cv 92-0453643s (Jun. 17, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  5. Summit v. Comm'n, Env't Protection, No. Cv91 050 26 43 (Jul. 20, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API