Legal Opinion

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Malynn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2012No. 2011-1428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Steven Reynolds Malynn of Medina, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0067339, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1996. We imposed an attorney-registration suspension in November 2011 for his failure to register for the 2011 to 2013 biennium. In re Attorney Registration Suspension of Malynn, 130 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2011-Ohio-5627, 956 N.E.2d 310. And on December 29, 2011, the Commission on Continuing Legal Education issued an order suspending Malynn for failing to comply with the continuing-legal-education requirements of Gov.Bar R. X. Both suspensions remain in effect.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SimecekOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. DismukeOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Akron Bar Association v. Parkin.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Ludwig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API