Legal Opinion

Hohenstein v. Dodds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1943No. 33,399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an action against a licensed veterinarian to recover damages for his alleged negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff’s pigs. Defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff is a farmer who was engaged in raising a herd of purebred. Spotted Poland China hogs. May 29, 1940, he noticed that one pig had died and some of the rest of the herd were ill. He called defendant to examine them. Defendant came to the farm and, after an examination, the extent of which is in dispute, vaccinated the pigs for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lippold v. KiddOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Keyes v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Crozier v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Johnson v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. State v. WangbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Lawin v. City of Long PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Baker v. MacGillis Gibbs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API