Legal Opinion

Lawin v. City of Long Prairie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. CX-84-189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the City of Long Prairie from a judgment for damages of $10,000 to respondent William Lawin’s basement caused by a sewer back-up. Long Prairie contends the trial court erred in denying its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), on the grounds there was insufficient evidence of causation. Long Prairie also claims the trial court erred in admitting estimates of the replacement costs of paneling, carpet, and furniture on the issue of damages sustained from these losses. Lawin petitions for review of the trial court’s remittitur…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Kinikin v. HeupelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Tate v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Pettinger v. Village of WinnebagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re W.R. Grace & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  2. Fletcher v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Graffunder v. City of MahtomediCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Jindra v. City of St. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API