Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dilley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1913No. 7,782PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Sullivan Circuit Court; Charles E. Henderson, Judge. Action by Rose Dilley and others against Ray Scott. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

— This is an action by appellees for the partition of certain real estate in a part of which appellant, by way of cross-complaint, seeks to have a trust declared.

The facts which underlie and made possible the litigation are in substance as follows: On August 9, 1868, Elijah H. Dilley and Mary Ann Neal were united in marriage. The wife, Mary Ann Dilley, was the owner of a farm which she and her husband, afterwards, about 1872 or 1873 disposed of for the sum of $3,675. The husband, about this time bought another farm, which is a part of the land sought to be partitioned. The wife, Mary Ann…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parrett v. PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. McGrew v. GraystonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Benson v. DempsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Toney v. WendlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cowan v. HenikaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. UlshIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Elliott v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Rickes v. RickesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. First Trust Co. v. HammondNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bullerdick v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API