Young v. City of Hokes Bluff
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Sue Tidmore Young, was convicted in municipal court of driving under the influence of alcohol. She appealed her conviction to the Etowah Circuit Court for a trial de novo and was again found guilty. She was fined $250.00 plus court costs and was required to attend D.U.I. school.
The appellant contends that the circuit court never obtained jurisdiction in her case because the City of Hokes Bluff failed to file a new complaint with that court. She relies on Burke v.City of Rainbow City, [Ms. 90-749, September 20, 1991], 1991 WL 197861 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991), for the proposition that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Ex Parte HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Beals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969
- Rogers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stegall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Stoll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Burke v. City of Rainbow CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.