Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1969No. 1 Div. 332PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Transferred to 1 Div. 3. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama].

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of assault with a pistol, a misdemeanor. Code 1940, T. 14, § 33. Scott was fined $50.00 to which the trial judge added 90 days hard labor with suspension of sentence during good behavior for twenty-four months. Holman v. State, 43 Ala.App. 509, 193 So.2d 770.

The facts are simple; they either tend to exonerate or to convict. Under familiar principles, we must take that version which upholds the verdict below.

*151Briefly, Scott went to the home of one Charles Harrington and presented a pistol. Thereupon, whilst holding the gun on his victim, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Taylor v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Herrmann v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curtis Leon Lomax v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Beals v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Bracewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Young v. City of Hokes BluffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API