Ex Parte Hood
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Certiorari was granted to resolve a conflict between the terms of statutes pertaining to appeals from convictions in municipal courts. The facts in these consolidated cases are amply recited in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. That court affirmed judgments of conviction in circuit court for inharmonious reasons
The issue before us is whether or not the circuit court obtained jurisdiction of these municipal appeals. The two statutes which appear to govern that question are sections12-22-110 and 12-14-70 of the Code of 1975. Section 12-22-110 states:
When an appeal is taken to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKinstry v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- McLosky v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Aderhold v. Mayor of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Ex Parte McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Brooks v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Coalition for Adequacy v. ChilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- City of Dothan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- J.M.V. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Sanders v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Vizzina v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.